Poker Office 3?

[GoldBoar]

Originally Posted by turfy

when you play freeroll you have total ROI : N/A

That's correct. You made no investment (free buyin with no fee) so mathematically, you can have no return on it.

Cheers.

[Ludwigo]

Is it possible to export the PO database in any other software?

[turfy]

Originally Posted by GoldBoar

That's correct. You made no investment (free buyin with no fee) so mathematically, you can have no return on it.

Cheers.

total of all tournament have N/A not only freeroll

I prefer buy HOLD'EM MANAGER

[OmnisMedius]

Originally Posted by UsulDaNeriak View Post
hhhm, what does this mean for users form 2006 with licences without annual fee?

Originally Posted by warebel

same question here

Since this question does not get answered, and this summer ends tomorrow. I will jump to Holdem manager.

Been testing HM for a week now, and I must say that there is very little chances PO3 is so good that it justifies annual fee.

[Kozmo]

Originally Posted by OmnisMedius

Since this question does not get answered, and this summer ends tomorrow. I will jump to Holdem manager.

Been testing HM for a week now, and I must say that there is very little chances PO3 is so good that it justifies annual fee.

Today is July 30/08, Fall begins Sept,22/08, meaning summer ends Sept,21/08. So what planet do you live on.

[GoldBoar]

Originally Posted by turfy

total of all tournament have N/A not only freeroll

Your first post said freeroll had ROI of N/A. Regardless, the same math applies once you include a single cash in a freeroll to your total tournaments. As soon as you have an Investment of zero, you cannot have a Return on it.

[turfy]

Originally Posted by GoldBoar

Your first post said freeroll had ROI of N/A. Regardless, the same math applies once you include a single cash in a freeroll to your total tournaments. As soon as you have an Investment of zero, you cannot have a Return on it.

0 + 1 = 0 ? ahahahahahahaha

[turfy]

No answer from support about all question.

Poker Office is dead.

[Ziraili]

Originally Posted by turfy

0 + 1 = 0 ? ahahahahahahaha

Whats so funny about the result being N/A ? I guess you know RIO is a percentage-number, right ? Heard of this thing called "Division by zero"? RIO-calculations are pretty basic math: (winnings/100) - (buyin/100) = RIO

Since your buyin is 0, you cant devide 0 by 100? So the entire calculation make your computer scream in aggony and report back a error, "Division by Zero - my digital brain dont compute that stuff" (And nor do you human one i guess?)

if you then try adding up the RIO's of the diff. levels, you still drag that N/A along, and the total RIO will also be N/A, again because of your limitations with percentage-numbers when it comes to 0 (or N/A)

[turfy]

Originally Posted by Ziraili

Whats so funny about the result being N/A ? I guess you know RIO is a percentage-number, right ? Heard of this thing called "Division by zero"? RIO-calculations are pretty basic math: (winnings/100) - (buyin/100) = RIO

Since your buyin is 0, you cant devide 0 by 100? So the entire calculation make your computer scream in aggony and report back a error, "Division by Zero - my digital brain dont compute that stuff" (And nor do you human one i guess?)

if you then try adding up the RIO's of the diff. levels, you still drag that N/A along, and the total RIO will also be N/A, again because of your limitations with percentage-numbers when it comes to 0 (or N/A)

0 + 1 is not = 0 but 1 ... yes 1 it's true

when you play 1 freeroll and 10000 sitngo 100$ and 1000 sitngo 200$ total roi = N/A

0 + 1000000 + 200000 = 0 ? you are funny

With all other tracker you have correct ROI not N/A but it's true Poker Office is out of date